Bram Cohen ([info]bramcohen) wrote,
@ 2008-10-19 02:36:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
BusinessWeek profile
There's a profile of me in BusinessWeek. It's a fairly reasonable portrayal, although it focuses a bit much on the asperger's angle. I don't really view my life through the whole overcoming disability narrative (same as most people with disabilities), and tell people that in so many words, but it's such a nice story that journalists tend to focus on it a bit. I mention my asperger's to journalists primarily because, well duh, if you're doing a profile on someone and they have an obvious disability that's clearly something worth mentioning.

There are of course some comments from the usual haters. Some of this seems to be based on an assumption that I'm of the anarcho-libertarian stripe, that movement which is really just neo-social darwinism. For the record, I'm not even vaguely a libertarian. I'm in favor of a higher minimum wage (why that thing never gets inflation indexed is beyond me), national health care, a big fat carbon tax, and open immigrations, as are the bulk of all economists. Only one out of those four is even vaguely consistent with libertarianism. I also find Ayn Rand completely unreadable due to a total lack of literary merit, although I will say that using logic to 'prove' the virtue of laissez-faire capitalism when laissez-faire capitalism is one of one's clearly stated axioms is hardly an insight at all.

Other random notes. I don't remember saying the 'only stupid people care about details' comment, although I have a feeling I was making a somewhat qualified point. There are people who perform necessary jobs where all they do is handle lots of little details, and they are not as a rule stupid. I don't know why editors like picking out really bad pictures of me (the one they used for this article was a test shot, with me squinting into the light). I'd gained some weight at the time the video was shot, although I've lost most of it by now. Fiddling with a rubik's cube during a meeting is sort of like talking to someone while they're driving - you stop doing when something important is going on, and it's otherwise not a big deal, although I've learned not to bring fiddle toys to meetings by now.



(Post a new comment)


[info]propopdan
2008-10-19 03:15 pm UTC (link)
I just wanted to say thank you for creating BitTorrent. :)

(Reply to this)


[info]granting
2008-10-19 03:53 pm UTC (link)
I only really met you once, back in ~2000, when I gave you (and one or two others) a ride home from one of Fernando's club nights.

But for what it is worth, I never even noticed Asperger's.

(Reply to this)


[info]mwickens
2008-10-19 03:58 pm UTC (link)
using logic to 'prove' the virtue of laissez-faire capitalism when laissez-faire capitalism is one of one's clearly stated axioms is hardly an insight at all

Ayn Rand did not regard capitalism as an axiom. All her political views stemmed from her ideas on metaphysics, epistemology, the nature of man, and ethics. She showed that capitalism was the only moral system since it is the only one consistent with man's requirements for living.

See this page for more info:

http://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/capitalism.html

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]bramcohen
2008-10-19 04:21 pm UTC (link)
She phrased the axiom as 'property rights'. Same diff.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]mwickens
2008-10-19 05:54 pm UTC (link)
She phrased the axiom as 'property rights'. Same diff.

No, wrong again. I recommend Leonard Peikoff's book, Objectivism: The Philosophy of Ayn Rand, if you want to understand the hierarchical nature of her philosophy. Her only axioms are metaphysical. She never simply assumes the validity of property rights or capitalism.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]spider88
2008-10-19 05:07 pm UTC (link)
Why do people assume you're an anarcho-libertarian? Because of the youthful socializing with the cypherpunks? Christ that would make most bay area geeks some sort of neo-social Darwinist.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]bramcohen
2008-10-19 05:31 pm UTC (link)
It appears to mostly be because I founded a dot com.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]unprotoize
2008-10-20 05:04 pm UTC (link)
It happens to me too. I'd like a t-shirt or something more plainly identifying my non-libertarian status.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]lupoleboucher
2008-10-19 07:46 pm UTC (link)
Whatever your level of aspergers (I'm more a fan of the word "eccentric"), it's an excellent negotiation tactic to mention it early and often to put people on the defensive.

Business Week types are more concerned with your opinion on intellectual property rights than on carbon tax or national health care. Most big business types support these things. Consider, there is today an entire corporation, paying several people full time salaries, to maintain and market and defend the intellectual property represented by the idea of "Zorro," which was an idea invented in 1919. There are zillions of such companies, and technology scares the crap out of them.

Also, I'm pretty sure they're going for the Keanu Reeves in Matrix look in most of the fame and fortune photos I've seen of you. Forgive them; people lack imagination. Maybe you should show them some bullwhip tricks.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]bramcohen
2008-10-21 06:03 pm UTC (link)
I've never tried to pull the pity on the disabled guy guilt thing, but I suppose some of that happens implicitly.

Photographers love taking pictures of me juggling, but they hardly ever get run.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]binarybits
2008-10-20 08:56 pm UTC (link)
The bulk of all economists are in favor of the minimum wage and national health care? That sounds unlikely to me. Or do you just means that economists are pro-open-borders?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]bramcohen
2008-10-21 05:59 pm UTC (link)
Yes, the bulk of all economists are in favor of minimum wage and national health care. A higher minimum wage results in big salary gains for the lowest paid workers with only a small number of lost jobs, while national health care would just plain save money and result in better care.

This is the bulk of actual economists. There are a huge number of pundits who masquerade as economists, which can give misleading impressions.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

puzzles
[info]jeffgoetz
2008-10-26 12:35 am UTC (link)
Bram,
I'm a 3rd year undergrad student at University of Florida and I've been involved with research on improving health care for patients who have any of the autism spectrum disorders. My Mom sent me your article because she thought you reminded her a lot of myself. So when I read the article I realized that I remembered you from twisty puzzles, describing your idea about a mechanism for the pentultimate. I responded with a post describing my own idea for a mechanism and your reply was along the lines of "impossible". I never thought about that again until I saw pictures of the finished puzzle a few years later. Of course I would know it was you right away upon reading your article, so I really enjoyed reading about who "Bram" really is. My mom was right, we do have much in common.

Jeff Goetz
Jwgoetz@ufl.edu

(Reply to this)

Yes
[info]yllwsmly
2008-10-26 08:46 am UTC (link)
I'd go on, but I would waste your time. Thank you Bram. You make sense and I appreciate this. You likely won't read this.

Cheers.

Jeremie

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…