Thu, Apr. 14th, 2011, 05:34 pm
Python wish list
Now that the moratorium on Python language features is over, I'll put in my thoughts on what new stuff the language could use. I don't have much to suggest, and what I do have to suggest is fairly minor. This is because I'm happy with the language.
- new on default parameters
- One of the gotchas in python is that default parameters are reused, so if you say:
def spam(eggs = ):
then eggs will get set to the same list every time, and modifications will get carried over between calls. This can be hacked like this:
def spam(eggs = None):
if eggs is None:
eggs = 
This works, but is ugly, and prevents passing in None as a value for eggs. It would be better to be able to simply say:
def spam(eggs = new ):
which should do exactly what you expect.
- ^ on bytes
- A strange oversight in Python3 is that bitwise operators don't work on byte arrays. The ^, & and | operators should work on bytes of equal length, doing exactly what they obviously should. Trying to apply them to bytes of unequal length should probably result in an error. It's easy enough to write functions to do these things, but they're slow, and there's only one reasonable semantics for what those operators should do on byte arrays anyway.
- raw binary conversion
- Maybe this has been added to the standard library and I just haven't heard about it, but a longstanding annoying missing piece of functionality is simple conversion between ints and big or little endian representations of them as bytes. Again, this is easy enough to implement, but is slow when done in Python and is hardly an obscure piece of functionality.
- dictionary scrambling
- This might be an obscure piece of functionality, but I'd like the ability to change the hashing function which dictionaries use, because I write tests which depend on my code behaving the same way every time it's run, and I'd like to be able to test that it doesn't have any dependencies on the order of iterating over dictionary keys or values.
Fri, Apr. 15th, 2011 07:20 am (UTC)
manuzhai: dictionary scrambling
Actually it's not the dict that defines the hashing method, it's the __hash__() method of the class of the objects used as keys. So you could probably handle this in your own code by setting the __class__ of the keys to a subclass of their actual __class__, plus a changed __hash__ method?
Fri, Apr. 15th, 2011 04:03 pm (UTC)
bramcohen: Re: dictionary scrambling
Yeah, I could do something like that, but that would involve extensive ugly changes to my code, when it should just be a single call to the stdlib.